A Systematic Comparison Of Methods For Low-resource Dependency Parsing On Genuinely Low-resource Languages | Awesome LLM Papers Add your paper to Awesome LLM Papers

A Systematic Comparison Of Methods For Low-resource Dependency Parsing On Genuinely Low-resource Languages

Clara Vania, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Anders Søgaard, Adam Lopez . Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) 2019 – 51 citations

[Paper]   Search on Google Scholar   Search on Semantic Scholar
Datasets EMNLP Training Techniques

Parsers are available for only a handful of the world’s languages, since they require lots of training data. How far can we get with just a small amount of training data? We systematically compare a set of simple strategies for improving low-resource parsers: data augmentation, which has not been tested before; cross-lingual training; and transliteration. Experimenting on three typologically diverse low-resource languages—North S'ami, Galician, and Kazah—We find that (1) when only the low-resource treebank is available, data augmentation is very helpful; (2) when a related high-resource treebank is available, cross-lingual training is helpful and complements data augmentation; and (3) when the high-resource treebank uses a different writing system, transliteration into a shared orthographic spaces is also very helpful.

Similar Work