Unqovering Stereotyping Biases Via Underspecified Questions | Awesome LLM Papers Add your paper to Awesome LLM Papers

Unqovering Stereotyping Biases Via Underspecified Questions

Tao Li, Tushar Khot, Daniel Khashabi, Ashish Sabharwal, Vivek Srikumar . Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 2020 – 54 citations

[Paper]   Search on Google Scholar   Search on Semantic Scholar
ACL Compositional Generalization Datasets EMNLP Ethics & Fairness Fine Tuning Interdisciplinary Approaches Model Architecture Multimodal Semantic Representation Question Answering Tools

While language embeddings have been shown to have stereotyping biases, how these biases affect downstream question answering (QA) models remains unexplored. We present UNQOVER, a general framework to probe and quantify biases through underspecified questions. We show that a naive use of model scores can lead to incorrect bias estimates due to two forms of reasoning errors: positional dependence and question independence. We design a formalism that isolates the aforementioned errors. As case studies, we use this metric to analyze four important classes of stereotypes: gender, nationality, ethnicity, and religion. We probe five transformer-based QA models trained on two QA datasets, along with their underlying language models. Our broad study reveals that (1) all these models, with and without fine-tuning, have notable stereotyping biases in these classes; (2) larger models often have higher bias; and (3) the effect of fine-tuning on bias varies strongly with the dataset and the model size.

Similar Work