Great Models Think Alike And This Undermines AI Oversight | Awesome LLM Papers Contribute to Awesome LLM Papers

Awesome LLM Papers

A curated collection of research papers on Large Language Models (LLMs), transformers, prompting, fine-tuning, and multi-modal systems. Maintained by Sean Moran.

Contact Sean Moran about this survey or website. Made with Jekyll and Hyde.

Great Models Think Alike And This Undermines AI Oversight

Shashwat Goel, Joschka Struber, Ilze Amanda Auzina, Karuna K Chandra, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Douwe Kiela, Ameya Prabhu, Matthias Bethge, Jonas Geiping . No Venue 2025

[Paper] [Paper]   Search on Google Scholar   Search on Semantic Scholar
Training Techniques

As Language Model (LM) capabilities advance, evaluating and supervising them at scale is getting harder for humans. There is hope that other language models can automate both these tasks, which we refer to as “AI Oversight”. We study how model similarity affects both aspects of AI oversight by proposing a probabilistic metric for LM similarity based on overlap in model mistakes. Using this metric, we first show that LLM-as-a-judge scores favor models similar to the judge, generalizing recent self-preference results. Then, we study training on LM annotations, and find complementary knowledge between the weak supervisor and strong student model plays a crucial role in gains from “weak-to-strong generalization”. As model capabilities increase, it becomes harder to find their mistakes, and we might defer more to AI oversight. However, we observe a concerning trend – model mistakes are becoming more similar with increasing capabilities, pointing to risks from correlated failures. Our work underscores the importance of reporting and correcting for model similarity, especially in the emerging paradigm of AI oversight.

https://huggingface.co/discussions/paper/67a5b9137897c8f540615673

Similar Work