What Makes A Good Conversation? How Controllable Attributes Affect Human Judgments | Awesome LLM Papers Contribute to Awesome LLM Papers

What Makes A Good Conversation? How Controllable Attributes Affect Human Judgments

Abigail See, Stephen Roller, Douwe Kiela, Jason Weston . Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North 2019 – 242 citations

[Paper]   Search on Google Scholar   Search on Semantic Scholar
Uncategorized

A good conversation requires balance – between simplicity and detail; staying on topic and changing it; asking questions and answering them. Although dialogue agents are commonly evaluated via human judgments of overall quality, the relationship between quality and these individual factors is less well-studied. In this work, we examine two controllable neural text generation methods, conditional training and weighted decoding, in order to control four important attributes for chitchat dialogue: repetition, specificity, response-relatedness and question-asking. We conduct a large-scale human evaluation to measure the effect of these control parameters on multi-turn interactive conversations on the PersonaChat task. We provide a detailed analysis of their relationship to high-level aspects of conversation, and show that by controlling combinations of these variables our models obtain clear improvements in human quality judgments.

Similar Work